Legal Opinion

Adams Apple Distributing Co. v. Zagel

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 20, 1986No. 85-2550PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jiganti

This action arises out of the search and seizure of the business premises of the plaintiff, Adams Apple Distributing Company. Adams Apple sought in its complaint a declaration that sections 2 and 3 of the Drug Paraphernalia Control Act (Act) are unconstitutional (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 56½, par. 2101 et seq.). In addition, Adams Apple requested injunctive relief and damages against the defendant, James B. Zagel, as director of the Department of Law Enforcement for an alleged deprivation of constitutional rights. (42 U.S.C. sec. 1983 (1982).) The trial court, on Zagel’s motion, dismissed…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Coates v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ardt v. Illinois Department of Professional RegulationIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. People v. FeldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  3. Ardt v. Illinois Department of Professional RegulationIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  4. People v. FeldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API