Legal Opinion

Haynes v. Emc Mortgage Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 9, 2012No. A131023PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*331Opinion

RIVERA, J.

Nathaniel Haynes appeals from a judgment of dismissal following the court’s order sustaining a demurrer to his first amended complaint. He contends that the trial court erred in ruling that Civil Code1 section 2932.5’s provisions requiring the assignee of a mortgagee to record the assignment prior to exercising a power to sell real property does not apply to deeds of trust. We affirm.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

As this appeal arises after the sustaining of a demurrer, the general rule is that we “assume the truth of the facts alleged in the complaint and the reasonable inferences that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. BentleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. North Bay Regional Center v. MaldonadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Coleman v. Gulf Insurance GroupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Monterey S.P. Partnership v. W. L. Bangham, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Domarad v. Fisher & Burke, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Orcilla v. Big Sur, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Brown v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. M'Guinness v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Macklin v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. (In re Macklin)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2013

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API