Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Boston Edison Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 25, 2005PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCowin, J.

The plaintiffs in this case, the Commonwealth, the Boston Redevelopment Authority (BRA), and the Massachusetts Convention Center Authority (MCCA), seek to recover costs allegedly incurred as part of a cleanup they undertook of a hazardous waste site (site) that had previously been owned by the defendants Sak Recycling Corporation, Walter Fiore and Fiore Construction Company (collectively, the Sak defendants). Defendant Boston Edison Company (Boston Edison) had, over a period of many years, disposed of material at the site. The plaintiffs’ claims arise under the Massachusetts Oil and Hazardous…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Amoco Oil Company v. Borden, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  3. Redwing Carriers, Inc. v. Saraland ApartmentsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  4. Board of Education v. Assessor of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  5. United Technologies Corporation v. Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bank v. Thermo Elemental Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  2. Scott v. NG US 1, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  3. Clean Harbors Environmental Services, Inc. v. Boston Basement Technologies, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
  4. Commonwealth v. BiagiottiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  5. Dicicco v. Department of Environmental ProtectionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API