Legal Opinion
Dicicco v. Department of Environmental Protection
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided September 2, 2005No. 04-P-1095PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCypher, J.
The plaintiffs, eleven residents of Westwood, filed a complaint in Superior Court on January 6, 2003, objecting to an administrative consent order entered into between the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and the town of West-wood (Westwood). The consent order requires Westwood to effect about 24,000 square feet of wetland restoration and replication, as compensation for the previous illegal filling of *424protected wetlands during construction of a middle school and related facilities.
A Superior Court judge, ruling that the DEP has discretion under its statutory enforcement…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- Levy v. Board of Registration & Discipline in MedicineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- City of Boston v. Massachusetts Port AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Citizens for Responsible Environmental Management v. Attleboro Mall, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mostyn v. Department of Environmental ProtectionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
- Fease v. VendenakkerMassachusetts Superior Court · 2012
- McLane, Graf, Raulerson & Middleton, P.C. v. GradyMassachusetts Superior Court · 2014