Legal Opinion

Lusk v. City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1898PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Cook county; tile Hon. W. T. Hodson, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Craig

This is an appeal from a judgment of confirmation entered in the county court of Cook county April 20, 1898, confirming an assessment levied for the purpose of defraying the expenses of paving Bonney avenue, from Ogden avenue to Douglas Park boulevard. The objections to the confirmation were filed by Charles D. Lusk and Henry H. Gag"e, and among others was the following: “That the ordinance providing for the making of said improvement does not specify the nature, character, locality and description of the proposed improvement.” Other objections were filed, but in the view we take of the case…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Kankakee v. PotterIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Cass v. People ex rel. KocherspergerIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Otis v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Lusk v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Rich v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Kuester v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  4. City of Chicago v. HoldenIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Foss v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1900

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API