Legal Opinion

Rich v. City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1900PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from the Comity Court of Cook county; the Hon. William T. Hodson, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Carter

Rich and others, owners, respectively, of certain lots in Chicago, have appealed from a judgment of confirmation of a special assessment, made under the act of 1897, to defray the cost of curbing, filling" and paving with asphalt certain streets of that city.

As to eight certain lots fronting on Monroe street, (formerly Brooks avenue,) Rich, the owner, gave in evidence, under his objections filed, a certain judgment of said county court rendered in 1895, confirming a special assessment made to curb, fill and macadamize said Brooks avenue, and moved the court to dismiss the petition as to said…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Maywood Co. v. Village of MaywoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Vane v. City of EvanstonIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Lusk v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  4. McChesney v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  5. People ex rel. Kochersperger v. LingleIllinois Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
  2. City of Chicago v. NodeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Chivers v. Board of Com'rs of Johnston CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. City of Chicago v. KoffIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  5. American Trust Co. v. Michigan Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API