Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. Holden

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1901PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Writ of Error to the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. Russell P. Goodwin, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Carter

This writ of error was sued out by the city of Chicago to reverse a judgment of the county court sustaining objections to the confirmation of a special assessment levied to pay the cost of grading, paving and curbing Ogden avenue from Warren avenue to West Twelfth street, in said city, and dismissing the petition of the city.

This court reversed a judgment confirming said special assessment in Holden v. City of Chicago, 185 Ill. 526, and remanded the cause, stating in the opinion “that the ordinance in question contains the same defect which was held fatal in the Lusk case.” (Lusk v. City of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lusk v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Kuester v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Holden v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hecht Co. v. McLaughlin Hecht C. v. Ellison Bronze Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  2. Holden v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Beckett v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Hecht Co. v. McLaughlin Hecht C. v. Ellison Bronze Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API