Legal Opinion

Young v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 10, 1987No. 50742PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SATZ, Presiding Judge.

This is an action under Rule 27.26. The trial court denied movant’s pro se motion. Movant appeals. We reverse and remand.

Movant was convicted by a jury of capital murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. Her conviction was affirmed on direct appeal. State v. Young, 610 S.W.2d 8 (Mo.App.1980). The following events then occurred:

3/11/85 Movant files a pro se motion under Rule 27.26.

3/25/85 Counsel is appointed to represent movant.

4/18/85 Motion for change of judge is filed and granted.

5/21/85 New hearing judge sets prehearing conference on 6/7/85.

6/7/85 Prosecutor…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Fields v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  3. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  4. Wiglesworth v. WyrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  5. State v. StidhamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Young v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Eggers v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Luster v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. William T. Boliek v. Michael Bowersox, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  5. Woolsey v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API