Eggers v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KAROHL, Judge.
Movant appeals denial of relief in a Rule 27.26 proceeding wherein movant sought relief from the conviction and sentence for the charge of capital murder, Section 565.-001 RSMo 1978. We quote the single claim of error asserted by movant on appeal:
THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN ENTERING ITS FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER DISMISSING APPELLANT’S UNAMENDED PRO SE PETITION PURSUANT TO MISSOURI SUPREME COURT RULE 27.26 FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
A) APPOINTED COUNSEL HAD FAILED TO AMEND APPELLANT’S PRO SE MOTION, AND
B) THE TRIAL COURT DID NOT ADDRESS THE ISSUE OF INEFFECTIVE…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fields v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- Young v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- State v. EggersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
3Cited by17 opinions
- Guyton v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- State v. PerezMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- Luster v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Loewe v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- Reagan v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.