Legal Opinion

Wiglesworth v. Wyrick

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 12, 1976No. 59208PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINCH, Judge.

This is an original proceeding in habeas corpus. We quash the writ heretofore issued for the reason that the relief to which petitioner claims to be entitled is required by Rule 27.261 to be sought by a motion filed in accordance with the provisions of that rule in the circuit court wherein the judgment and sentence attacked by petitioner were entered.

Petitioner pleaded guilty on May 15,1975, in the Circuit Court of DeKalb County to a charge of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, third offense, a felony under § 564.440.2 The information to which petitioner pleaded guilty…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. HaymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Francis T. Glynn v. Robert Donnelly, John M. Farrell v. Robert DonnellyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
  4. Barrett v. Hunter, Warden. Rutledge v. Hunter, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  5. James William Smith v. State of KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Day v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  2. State v. NunleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  3. Cole v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Bartz v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State Ex Rel. Zinna v. SteeleSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API