Legal Opinion
Attorney Grievance v. Sperling
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided March 1, 2021No. 6ag/19PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Samuel Sperling, Miscellaneous Docket AG No. 6, September Term, 2019. Opinion by Biran, J. Attorney Discipline – Competence, Diligence, and Communication with Clients – Conduct Prejudicial to the Administration of Justice – Suspension. A 120-day suspension is the appropriate sanction in a case in which an experienced personal injury attorney demonstrated a lack of competence, diligence, and communication in several instances while representing two individuals as plaintiffs in the same motor vehicle tort case. After moving for and receiving a deferral of…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Jesse Meyer v. Portfolio Recovery AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SheridanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Anne Arundel County Board of Education v. NorvilleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. BleeckerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. MonfriedCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Attorney Grievance v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Attorney Grievance v. NeverdonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
- Attorney Grievance v. LeathermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. DonnellyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.