Legal Opinion

United States v. Martin Frank

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 27, 1975No. 1122, Docket 74-2639PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OAKES, Circuit Judge:

The “Go-Go” stock market of the late 1960’s produced a wide variety of stock frauds reminiscent of the pre-SEC 1920’s, with one of the more common schemes involving market price manipulation upon a company’s “going public.” The stock, preferably one with a salable or “glamorous” name, would originally be issued to insiders, with only a limited number of shares issued (a “thin float”). The price of the stock would then be manipulated by trading back and forth among the insiders, with the limited number of shares available for trading making it reasonably easy to control…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. United States v. FinkelsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  2. United States v. Anthony Esparsen, United States of America v. Kelly Esparsen, United States of America v. Robert McFaddenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  3. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Lloyd DIXON, Jr., AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  4. United States v. JamesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  5. United States v. Rev. Alberto Mejias, A/K/A Rev. Angel OrtizCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API