Legal Opinion

United States v. Finkelstein

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 1, 1975No. Nos. 162, 163, 182 and 253, Dockets 75-1154, 75-1155, 75-1170 and 75-1171PublishedCited by 149 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Circuit Judge:

Viewed, as it must be, in a light most favorable to the government, the evidence introduced below established n that from early 1969 until the spring of 1970 Alan Segal (“Segal”), Anthony Scardino (“Scardino”), Burney Acton (“Acton”), Michael Clegg (“Clegg”) and others devised and executed a fraudulent scheme to amass and distribute to unsuspecting buyers thousands of shares of worthless stock of Pioneer Development Corporation (“Pioneer”), swindling them out of *520over three hundred thousand dollars in the process. To facilitate examination of the various alleged errors…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by149 opinions

  1. United States v. DeLunaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  2. United States v. DrougasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  3. State v. GrisbyWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  4. United States v. Beech-Nut Nutrition Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. Carlos Manuel Parodi, United States of America v. Edwin Barton Conway, United States of America v. Robert Lee LawsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983

144 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API