United States v. Finkelstein
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Circuit Judge:
Viewed, as it must be, in a light most favorable to the government, the evidence introduced below established n that from early 1969 until the spring of 1970 Alan Segal (“Segal”), Anthony Scardino (“Scardino”), Burney Acton (“Acton”), Michael Clegg (“Clegg”) and others devised and executed a fraudulent scheme to amass and distribute to unsuspecting buyers thousands of shares of worthless stock of Pioneer Development Corporation (“Pioneer”), swindling them out of *520over three hundred thousand dollars in the process. To facilitate examination of the various alleged errors…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by149 opinions
- United States v. DeLunaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. DrougasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- State v. GrisbyWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- United States v. Beech-Nut Nutrition Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Carlos Manuel Parodi, United States of America v. Edwin Barton Conway, United States of America v. Robert Lee LawsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
144 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.