Legal Opinion
In the Interest of S.P.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided May 26, 2005No. 05-03-00905-CVPublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION NUNC PRO TUNC
Opinion by
Justice MOSELEY.
On our own motion, we issue this opinion nunc pro tunc to correct a clerical error in our May 24, 2005 opinion. This is now the opinion of the Court.
Based on the jury’s verdict, the trial court entered a judgment terminating the parental rights of Katrina Palmo (Mother) and Charles Anthony Gray (Father) to their five minor children, S.P., S.G., M.G., S.P., and M.G. Mother and Father appeal. As set forth herein, we conclude that the Texas Family Code requirement that appellants file a statement of points on appeal within fifteen days of the final…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- In the Interest of K.C.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2007
- in the Interest of D.W., T.W., and S.G., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2008
- In Re DWCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008
- Oprean v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
- In the Interest of W.D.W.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2005
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.