Legal Opinion

United States v. Jenkins

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 25, 2011No. 09-10109, 09-10110PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

B. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

INTRODUCTION

This case arises out of a “pump and dump” scheme during which Randy Jenkins and Ira Gentry conspired to secretly acquire millions of shares of UniDyn Corporation stock, artificially inflate its value, sell it for significant profit, and launder the proceeds. After a sixteen-day trial, a jury convicted Jenkins and Gentry (“Appellants”) of multiple counts of securities fraud (15 U.S.C. §§ 78ff, 78j(b) 1 ); wire fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343); international concealment money laundering (18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(2)(B)(i); concealment money laundering (18 U.S.C.…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. United States v. VilarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  2. United States v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  3. United States v. MikhelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  4. United States v. ReyesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. Danny TeagueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API