Legal Opinion

Cause of Action v. National Archives and Records Administration

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 1, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2012-1342PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge.

In 2009, in the wake of the recent financial upheaval, Congress passed the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act, Pub. L. No. 111-21, 123 Stat. 1617 (2009). Among other things, FERA created the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, a temporary, 10-member, bipartisan body established within the legislative branch to “examine the causes, domestic and global, of the current financial and economic crisis in the United States.” Id., § 5(a). The FCIC completed its investigatory work, submitted a report to Congress in early 2011, and terminated…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier ChurchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Malek v. Flagstar BankDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  2. Campaign for Accountability v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  3. Cause of Action v. National Archives & Records AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
  4. Cause of Action Inst. v. Internal Revenue Serv.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  5. Cause of Action Institute v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API