Legal Opinion

Theodulo Nava Reyes v. United States of America, Federico Perez v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 17, 1958No. 15851_1PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNES, Circuit Judge.

Each appellant was convicted of a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1407. This statute became effective as of July 18, 1956.

I. The Statute

Because of the language used in that statute, and particularly in its preamble, we quote the entire section:

“ § 1407. Border crossings — ■ narcotic addicts and violators.
“(a) In order further to give effect to the obligations of the United States pursuant to the Hague convention of 1912, proclaimed as a treaty on March 3, 1915 (38 Stat. 1912), and the limitation convention of 1931, proclaimed as a treaty on July 10, 1933 (48 Stat. 1571), and in…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Schenck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Lesly Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  2. D. H. Roe and Stratoray Oil, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  3. Timothy Leary v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  4. United States v. Kenneth J. BryzaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
  5. Maria Garcia-Gonzales v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API