Legal Opinion

Earle v. Froedtert Grain & Malting Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1938No. 27147. Department OnePublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

This action was instituted in November, 1936, by the receiver of the Olympic Club Company, a corporation, hereinafter referred to as the Olympic company, to recover a sum of money paid to appellant corporation on August 4, 1930, on the ground that such payment constituted an unlawful preference. Appellant demurred to respondent’s amended complaint, and the demurrer was overruled. Appellant answered, pleading two affirmative defenses, the second of which is that this action was not commenced within six months from the time of the filing of the application for the appointment of a receiver, as…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cox v. HartSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Sohn v. WatersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. Lewis v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Clawson v. Boston Acme Mines Development Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Great Northern Railway Co. v. SutherlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Ficarra v. Department of Regulatory Agencies, Division of InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. Johnston v. Beneficial Management Corp. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Lynch v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Lane v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Cowiche Growers, Inc. v. BatesWashington Supreme Court · 1941

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API