Legal Opinion

In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Gomsrud

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 16, 2000No. C2-99-742PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Richard Gomsrud practiced law while suspended for failing to pay his attorney registration fees and while on restricted status for failing to comply with continuing legal education (CLE) requirements. While suspended, he practiced law by holding himself out as a licensed attorney and accepting a retainer from a client. Gomsrud failed to provide services or respond to his client’s telephone calls. He also failed to cooperate in the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility’s ensuing investigation. We hold that such misconduct, taken as a whole, warrants *804indefinite suspension of…

3Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re the Discipline of CartwrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. In Re the Disciplinary Action Against JensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against PerrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  4. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against SiglerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  5. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Disciplinary Action Against LetourneauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  2. In re Disciplinary Action Against PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API