Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Laidlaw Environmental Services, Inc. v. County of Kern

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 9, 1996No. F024311PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BUCKLEY, J.—

Facts

In October 1991, Laidlaw Environmental Services, Inc. (LES LOKERN), noticed its intention to seek a conditional use permit and general plan amendment from Kern County to expand and modify its existing hazardous waste facility near the unincorporated town of Buttonwillow. LES LOKERN proposed to add a landfill and a container storage facility.

After accepting LES LOKERN’s application, Kern County Board of Supervisors appointed a local assessment committee (LAC) as directed by Health and Safety Code section 25199.7, subdivision (d). Among those persons appointed to LAC to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Green v. ObledoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Carsten v. Psychology Examining CommitteeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Board of Social Welfare v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. City Council v. McKinleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Save the Plastic Bag Coalition v. City of Manhattan BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Waste Management of Alameda County, Inc. v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Waste Management v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Padres Hacia Una Vida Mejor v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Irvine Valley College Academic Senate v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API