Legal Opinion
Hindel v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 18, 1938No. 6544PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAJOR, Circuit Judge.
The involved action was brought to recover upon a policy of public liability and property damage insurance issued by the defendant, in which Oler and Stine were named as assured, together with an endorsement thereon executed in conformity with the Contract Carrier Statute of the State of Indiana, Burns’ Ann.St.1933, § 47-1301 et seq. The complaint alleged that plaintiff’s decedent, while an employee of Oler and Stine, came to his death by reason of their negligence, while operating a certain motor vehicle and trailer in the conduct of their business under a certificate *779of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Van Norden v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Standard Life & Accident Ins. v. McNultyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Fidelity Casualty Co. of New York v. JacksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Continental Casualty Co. v. ShankelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
- Bosse v. Wolverine InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936
3Cited by11 opinions
- Earl W. Baker & Co. v. LagalyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
- Employers Ins. Co. of Alabama v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Utilities Insurance v. PotterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Commercial Standard Ins. v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
- Lloyds America v. FergusonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.