Legal Opinion

Holm v. Holm

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 2004No. S-03-290PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephan, J.

This appeal presents the question of whether an obligation to pay alimony terminates upon remarriage of the recipient by operation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-365 (Reissue 1998) where the decree provides that “alimony shall terminate upon the death of either party” but makes no reference to termination upon remarriage.

FACTS

A decree dissolving the marriage of Carl R. Holm and Barbara K. Holm, now known as Barbara K. Ashbridge, was entered by the district court for Otoe County on August 18,2000. The decree provided in relevant part:

The Petitioner, Carl R. Holm, should be and is hereby Ordered and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. BurlisonNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Gourley Ex Rel. Gourley v. Nebraska Methodist Health System, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Dawes v. Wittrock Sandblasting & Painting, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Dean v. YahnkeNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Misle v. HJA, INC.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Strunk v. Chromy-StrunkNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Bronsen v. Dawes CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Semler v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Cano v. WalkerNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Bronsen v. Dawes CountyNebraska Court of Appeals · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API