Legal Opinion
Cannon v. City of Philadelphia
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 24, 2000No. 2:98-cv-04790PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BRODY, District Judge.
Now before me are cross-motions for summary judgment. 1 For the reasons that follow, I will grant defendants’ motion and deny plaintiffs motion.
1. Background 2
Plaintiff brings claims against the City of Philadelphia and several police officers pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. She claims that, while she was having a heart attack, police officers failed to transport her to the hospital and blocked the road with parked police cars preventing someone else from driving her to the hospital.
On September 11, 1996,plaintiff was painting in the basement of her home. At…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- DiSalvio v. Lower Merion High School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Pahler v. City of Wilkes-BarreDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Leddy v. Township of Lower MerionDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- Mohammed Ex Rel. Mohammed v. School District of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- White v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.