Legal Opinion
Santoro v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority
Mohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court
Decided August 3, 2012No. GDTC-WC-12-108-JAMPublished
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum of Decision on Plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss
McNAMARA, J.
Introduction
The Plaintiff, Sheryl L. Santoro, surviving spouse, and the Estate of Rocco Santo-ro have filed a Motion to Dismiss Appeal on the ground that the appeal of Finding of Fact and Award has been filed in excess of twenty days as required under Mohegan Workers Compensation Law, Sec. 4-207.
Background
This appeal arises from the Decision of a Mohegan Workers Compensation Commissioner, (Pacelli, Cmsr.). The Commissioner ordered that the Respondent-Employer, Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority pay to Sheryl Santoro, surviving…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brookridge District Ass'n v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Young v. YoungSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Carl J. Herzog Foundation, Inc. v. University of BridgeportConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Wells Fargo Bank of Minnesota, N.A. v. MorganConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Bartha v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Court of Appeals · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.