Legal Opinion
Richards v. Texas a & M University System
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)
Decided March 10, 2004No. 10-01-183-CVPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*554OPINION
TOM GRAY, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal of an order dismissing a suit for want of jurisdiction. We state the facts largely as they appear in the pleadings of Michael Richards, appellant here and plaintiff in the trial court. For several years, Richards was employed as a maintenance worker by Texas A & M University System and Texas A & M University (collectively “TAMU”), appellees here and defendants in the trial court. While so employed, Richards suffered injuries to his back and other injuries. After Richards filed a workers’ compensation claim, TAMU terminated Richards’s…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ala. v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hagberg v. City of Pasadena, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
- Flores v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2007
- Edwards Aquifer Authority v. Day, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2008
- Alobaidi v. University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
- Edwards Aquifer Authority, (APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE) v. Burrell Day and Joel McDaniel, (APPELLEES/CROSS-APPELLANTS) State of Texas, (APPELLEE ONLY), Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.