Legal Opinion
Foster v. City of Oakland
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 27, 2008No. C 05-3110 MHP, C 04-4843 MHP, C 05-3204 MHP, C 06-2426 MHP, C 07-1773 MHPPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARILYN HALL PATEL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Darnell Foster, Rafael Duarte and Yancie Young have brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983 against the City of Oakland (“Oakland”); Richard Word, individually and in his capacity as the Oakland Chief of Police; Oakland police officers J. Festag and William Bergeron, individually and in their official capacities as police officers; and Does 1-25, alleging that defendants violated plaintiffs’ constitutional rights through a policy and practice of performing strip searches and body-cavity searches in public. Plaintiffs seek…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rattray v. Woodbury County, IowaDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2012
- Foster v. City of OaklandDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009
- Chung v. County of Santa ClaraDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Towns v. StannardDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2019