Legal Opinion
Foster v. City of Oakland
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 14, 2009No. C 05-3110 MHP, C 04-4843 MHP, C 05-3204 MHP, C 06-2426 MHP, C 07-1773 MHP, C 07-4179 MHP, C 07-6298 MHP, C08-3114 MHP, C08-4255 MHPPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
Re: Plaintiff Young’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
MARILYN HALL PATEL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Darnell Foster, Rafael Duarte and Yancie Young brought this against municipal and individual defendants, including Oakland police officer William Bergeron, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. Plaintiffs allege various violations of their constitutional rights through a policy and practice of performing strip searches and body-cavity searches in public. Now before the court is a motion for partial summary judgment on behalf of plaintiff Young only. Young seeks a declaratory…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Farkarlun v. HanningDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
- Brown v. ShortDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Cobarrubia v. EdwardsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021