Legal Opinion
Fowler v. Unified School District No. 259
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 21, 1997No. Nos. 95-3373, 95-3400PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
This case involves the question of whether a public school district, defendant Unified School District No. 259 (the “District”), in Sedgwick County, Kansas, must pay for full-time sign language interpretive services at a private school, for the benefit of a profoundly deaf child whose parents have voluntarily removed him from a public school in the District and placed him in the private school. The plaintiffs, Michael Fowler and his parents and next friends, Jay and Barbara Fowler, seek such services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Irving Independent School District v. TatroSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Urban Ex Rel. Urban v. Jefferson County School District R-1Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United Telecommunications, Inc. (Formerly United Utilities, Incorporated) v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Peter v. WedlCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Foley v. Special School Dist. of St. Louis CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1997
- Krista Westendorp v. Robert WedlCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Tucker v. Calloway County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Fowler v. Unified School District No. 259Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.