Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Calloway County Board of Education

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 18, 1998No. 96-6478PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DOWD, District Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellánts Dr. and Mrs. Charles and Marsha Tucker (“the Tuckers”) brought actions under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”),1 20 U.S.C. § 1400, et seq., on behalf of themselves and their minor son, Barkley, to recover the costs of providing a free appropriate public education (“FAPE”) for Barkley, a disabled child.2 On August 2, 1996, the district court *497entered its Memorandum Opinion and Order affirming the administrative decisions' of Kentucky’s Exceptional Children Appeals Board (“ECAB”) which denied the Tuckers’ request for…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United States Ex Rel. SchumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Roland M. And Miriam M. v. The Concord School CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  5. Heather S., by Her Natural Parent and Next Friend, Kathy S. v. State of Wisconsin, John T. Benson, Juanita PawlischCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tucker v. Calloway County Board Of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  2. Yibing Dong Huizong Lin, as Next Friends on Behalf of Their Daughter, Lisa Dong v. Board of Education of the Rochester Community Schools Angelynn MartinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API