Legal Opinion
Steckler v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 6, 1925No. 310PublishedCited by 182 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAND, Circuit Judge.
Steckler was a druggist with a permit to possess liquor. It was therefore essential to a conviction under count 2 to show that his possession, prima facie legal, had been abused, and that he was holding the liquors for sale contrary to the regulation under which he did his business. This the prosecution tried to do by proving sales of liquor at the defendant’s shop. Two of such sales were laid in counts 3 and 4, and proved as of that day. A third was not laid at all. but proved as of April 11. The jury acquitted the defendant on the sale counts and on count 1 for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Boone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
- Panzich v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922
- Carrignan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1923
- Marshallo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- Francis Drug Co. v. PotterDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by182 opinions
- Standefer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Harris v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. DoughertyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- United States v. CoplonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- United States v. Ronald BrownCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
177 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.