Legal Opinion

Birmingham Trust & Savings Co. v. Hightower

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 8, 1936No. 8 Div. 732PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

The appellant was appointed both executor and trustee under the will, and was charged with dual duties, that is, the general administration of his estate and the execution of a trust created by said will in favor of the testator’s wife, daughter, and other named beneficiaries thereunder. The estate was a very large one, and the trust created was to continue for quite a number of years.

Item 9 of the will says: “My said Executor and Trustee shall be entitled to receive for its services for executing this trust a sum equal to one half of one per cent of the reasonable…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Keith & Wilkinson v. ForsytheSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Whitney v. BurnhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  3. Raines v. Raines's ExecutorsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1874
  4. Baldwin v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Webb v. WebbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  2. Home Oil Mill v. WillinghamDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1945
  3. Byars v. MixonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  4. Corretti v. First National Bank of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  5. Seiple v. MitchellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API