Seiple v. Mitchell
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
This is an appeal by the receiver from a decree of the court on his application to-fix the amount of his compensation, in which the court fixed an amount unsatisfactory to him.
There being no statute which controls this question, nor which furnishes a guide for doing so, it is primarily within the sound discretion of the court having the custody and control of the receivership, having regard to all the relevant circumstances. And, in reviewing an exercise of that discretion on appeal, this Court will have much respect for the judgment of that court. There must appear to be an…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Stuart v. BoulwareSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Clifford v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- Washington Loan & Trust Co. v. Convention of Protestant Episcopal Church of the Diocese of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Polk v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jahn v. PerlbergCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1984
- Corretti v. First National Bank of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
- Corner Stone Funeral Chapel, Inc. v. MVMG, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2014
- Corner Stone Funeral Chapel, Inc. v. MVMG, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2014