Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rodgers v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

California Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1984No. S.F. 24594Published

1DissentReynoso, J.

I respectfully dissent. The employer, in my view, should pay benefits equal to the proportion of damages attributable to both the employer and the employee. Only then should the employer become eligible for a statutory credit.

A tripartite relationship exists in a lawsuit involving workers’ compensation and a third party: a dispute between employer and employee is gov*343erned by workers’ compensation (Lab. Code, § 3600); between employee and third party the principles of comparative negligence apply (Li v. Yellow Cab Co. (1975) 13 Cal.3d 804 [119 Cal.Rptr. 858, 532 P.2d 1226, 78 A.L.R.3d 393]);…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Aceves v. Regal Pale Brewing Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Associated Construction & Engineering Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Solari v. Atlas-Universal Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Kramer v. Cedu Foundation, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API