Legal Opinion

Higginbotham v. Workforce Safety & Insurance

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 2014No. 20140019PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] James E. Higginbotham appeals a district court order for judgment and judgment and a district court order affirming an administrative law judge’s (“ALJ”) decision, which affirmed a Workforce Safety and Insurance (“WSI”) order approving a rehabilitation plan and denying further disability benefits. We conclude the administrative order is in accordance with the law, and we affirm the district court judgment.

I

[¶ 2] Higginbotham, age 70, was employed by Industrial Contractors, Inc. (“ICI”) as a welder and pipefitter in May 2010 when he sustained an injury to his left…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. HaibeckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Svedberg v. NORTH DAKOTA WORKERS COMPENSATION BUREAUNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. HolzerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Bishop v. North Dakota Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Krueger v. Grand Forks CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Inwards v. North Dakota Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Welch v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Anderson v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  5. WSI v. KringlieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API