Inwards v. North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Kathy Inwards appeals from a judgment reversing an administrative law judge’s (“ALJ”) decision requiring Workforce Safety & Insurance (‘WSI”) to continue providing her disability and rehabilitation benefits. We conclude the ALJ erred as a matter of law in ruling Inwards had good cause for failing to comply with a retraining program because WSI’s previous order requiring Inwards to participate in the retraining program had been appealed and had not been finally resolved at the time she withdrew from the retraining program. We affirm the district court judgment reversing…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Application of Bank of RhameNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- Handwerker v. at & T Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Hagel v. HagelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Reliance Insurance Co. v. Public Service CommissionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Carlson v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. v. Departmnet of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Altru Specialty Services, Inc. v. North Dakota Department of Human ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Larson v. WSINorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- Opp v. Office of the North Dakota Attorney General - BCI CWL UnitNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
- E.R.J. v. T.L.B.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.