Legal Opinion

State v. Haibeck

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 2006No. 20050367PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] The State appeals from a trial court’s judgment dismissing an information charging Krystal Haibeck with four counts of possession of drugs and drug paraphernalia. The State argues the trial court erred in dismissing the charges after the State inadvertently destroyed physical evidence. We reverse and remand.

I

[¶ 2] Haibeck was charged with four counts of possession of drugs and drug paraphernalia following a July 5, 2003, traffic stop. In State v. Haibeck, 2004 ND 163, 685 N.W.2d 512, this Court reversed a trial court order granting Haibeck’s motion to suppress evidence…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. State v. HoweNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. SteffesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. ParisienNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. NoackNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Holden v. HoldenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. LougheadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Hale v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. BachmeierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API