Legal Opinion

Bezich v. Columbia Insurance Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1932No. 23566. Department TwoPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

Plaintiff instituted this action for the purpose of recovering judgment on a policy of fire insurance issued by defendant covering the furnishings of a restaurant in the city of Tacoma. Defendant insured this property against loss by fire in the sum of $1,700; the property having been damaged by fire several months after the issuance of the policy. A trial to the court, sitting without a jury, resulted in findings of fact and conclusions of law in defendant’s favor, followed by a. judgment dismissing the action, from which plaintiff appeals.

Respondent moves to dismiss the appeal, arguing that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Inland Finance Co. v. Home Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Dresher v. London & Lancashire InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Roesch v. GerstWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Brown v. Northwestern Mutual Fire Assn.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Smith v. KneisleyWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Tungsten Products, Inc. v. KimmelWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Fairview Lumber Co. v. MakosWashington Supreme Court · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API