Legal Opinion

Wheeler v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 24, 1916No. 7182PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Indictment for larceny of cow; from Morgan superior court— Judge Park. December 4, 1935.

1Opinion of the CourtWade, J.

1. In an indictment for cattle-stealing the following description of the animal alleged to have been stolen is sufficient, namely: “A certain black and white milk cow of the value of $25, of the personal goods of W. G-. Aeree.” “It is a matter of common knowledge, of which the court- will take judicial cognizance, that a cow is a female animal, is a horned animal, and has cloven hoofs; and . . the larceny of a cow is therefore' within the purview of section 159 of the Penal Code” (of 1895); Penal Code of 1910, § 156; Gibson v. State, 7 Ga. App. 692 (2, 3) (67 S. E. 838). The court did not err…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gibson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  2. Speer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  2. Garrett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  3. Pharr v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  4. Pierce v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  5. Adams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API