Garrett v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Indictment for larceny; from Worth superior court — Judge Eve. September 14, 1917.
1Opinion of the CourtBboyles, P. J.
• 1. In an indictment for simple larceny, where the offense charged is hog-stealing, the following description of the animals alleged to have been stolen is sufficient, viz.: “One black barrow hog of the value of six dollars; one black and white spotted female hog of the value of six dollars, of the personal property of Mrs. Elizabeth Wood, and both the value of twelve dollars.” Rivers v. State, 57 Ga. 28; Alderman v. State, Id. 367; Harvey v. State, 121 Ga. 590 (49 S. E. 674); Wheeler v. State, 18 Ga. App. 15 (88 S. E. 712); Geiger v. State, 21 Ga. App. 75 (93 S. E. 1027). The court did not…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jordan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Harvey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Rivers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
- Wheeler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- Eidson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- McDuffie v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Hixon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- Pulliam v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Cook v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.