Legal Opinion

Adams v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 31, 1917No. 9121PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Indictment for larceny; from city court of Macon — Judge Guerry. July 14, 1917.

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

In an indictment for simple larceny, which, alleges that the article stolen was “one bicycle painted red, and bearing trade-mark ‘Climax/ and of the value of $15.00, and of the personal goods of Bradford & Geeslin, a partnership composed of Frank S. Bradford and C. B. Geeslin,” the description of the property is sufficient to meet the requirement that “in indictments for larceny ‘the description [of the stolen propex’ty] should be simply such as, in connection with the other allegations, will affix-matively show the defendant to be guilty, will reasonably inform him of-the instance meant, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ayers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Patterson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Powell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  4. Bone v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  5. Rivers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pharr v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  2. Streeter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  3. Williamson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  4. Glass v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API