Legal Opinion
Clements v. Gabriel
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 26, 1991No. 17025PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Chief Justice.
Defendants appeal from a judgment entered against them in a jury verdict in a suit for breach of contract. We affirm.
FACTS
On August 5, 1985, the Clements and Gabriels entered into a contract whereby the Clements agreed to manage the real property, livestock, equipment and personal property owned by Gabriels. In exchange, the Clements were authorized to run forty-five head of cattle they owned along with four hundred head of cattle to be provided by Gabriels upon Gabriels’ ranch. Furthermore, the parties agreed to split the proceeds from the sale of the combined herd on a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Atwater Creamery Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Enchanted World Doll Museum v. BuskohlSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- First National Bank of Minneapolis v. Kehn Ranch, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Beka v. Lithium Corporation of AmericaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
- City of Sioux Falls v. Henry Carlson Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Canyon Lake Park, L.L.C. v. Loftus Dental, P.C.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- First Dakota National Bank v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- First Dakota National Bank v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Production Credit Ass'n of the Midlands v. WynneSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Honomichl v. ModlinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.