Legal Opinion
United States v. Pacific Forwarding Co.
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided October 26, 1934No. 20884PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NETERER, District Judge.
The plaintiff seeks to recover from the defendants for customs duties, internal revenue on and value of liquors fraudulently imported into the United States. The corporate defendants, it is charged, are creatures by charter of the laws of the province of British Columbia, Dominion of Canada, having their principal place of business in Vancouver, except the Brewers & Distillers of Vancouver, Limited, is chartered under the laws of the *649Dominion of Canada, with principal office in Vancouver.
The individual defendants are residents of British Columbia, Canada, except Samet,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Ex Parte United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- St. Clair v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co. v. McKibbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Clarence Austin v. Otis SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
- Mas v. Orange-Crush Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
- Brown v. BeckhamDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1943
- Clarence Austin v. Otis SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962