Legal Opinion

Carlton, Chamberlain & Co. v. Mays

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1875PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Supersecteas, granted on the petition of Ambrose Carlton and James H. Gardner, surviving partners of Carlton, Chamberlain & Co., to a judgment of the circuit court of Greenbrier county, rendered on November 3, 1873. The plaintiffs below were the said petitioners, and the defendants Jonathan Mays, William H. Montgomery and F. T. Montgomery. The material tacts appear in the opinion of the Court. The Hon. Homer A. Holt, judge of said circuit court, presided at the trial below.

1Opinion of the Court

Paull, Judge :

In 1873, the plaintiffs’ brought an action of assumpsit in the circuit court of Greenbrier county against the de*246fendants, for the recovery of an account for merchandise, and ^kd a declaration with the common counts. Defendants filed a plea of the statute of limitations, to which the plaintifis replied generally. The issue was tried before a jury, and, from a bill of exceptions found in the record, we learn that at the trial the defendants introduced William H. Montgomery, one of the defendants, as a witness to prove transactions between him and William P. Chamberlain, one of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rowt's adm'x. v. Kile's adm'r.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1829

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Shrewsbury v. MillerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Seabright v. SeabrightWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Voss v. KingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Fuller v. Margaret Mining Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Mooney v. BartonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API