Legal Opinion

Lay v. Pugh

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 12, 1928No. 328PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMouton, J.

Plaintiff brings this suit for compensation under the Employers’ Liability Act, Act No. 20 of 1914 as amended.

He alleges that he was injured in his right eye, the injury causing a total loss of that eye, while he was performing his duties as a carpenter in the repairing and changing the style of a building owned by Joseph Pugh, and situated in the town of Mandeville; that Augustus Smith, acting as agent, employed him to do the work for Pugh; that although Pugh has not actually denied liability he has not been able to collect the compensation he claims, and therefore asks the intervention of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shipp v. BordelonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  2. Blane v. IglehartLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1926
  3. Monroe Hardware Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Doss v. American Ventures, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
  2. Slocum v. LamartiniereLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. McAllister v. Peoples Homestead & Savings Ass'nLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Rester v. Community Stores, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Charity Hospital of Louisiana v. MorganLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API