Legal Opinion

Hillsborough Grocery Co. v. Leman

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1906PublishedCited by 10 opinions

This case was decided by Division A. Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, J.

An action of assumpsit upon common counts was brought in the Circuit Court for Hillsborough county by the defendants in error against the plaintiff in error. The defendant, The Hillsborough Grocery Company, filed the following pleas: (1) That it never was indebted as alleged; (2) That it did not promise as al*204leged; (3) That the plaintiffs at the commencement of this suit were and still are indebted to the defendant upon a promissory note, for the sum of four hundred dollars principal with interest at the rate of eight per cent, per annum from the first day of June, A. D. 1904, and for money…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1896
  2. C. B. Rogers Co. v. Meinhardt Bros. & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1896
  3. Smith v. KlaySupreme Court of Florida · 1904

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. German American Lumber Co. v. BrockSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  2. Gunn v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
  3. Bayshore Development Co. v. BondfoeySupreme Court of Florida · 1918
  4. Hillsborough Grocery Co. v. LemanSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
  5. Brookbank v. MathieuDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API