Hillsborough Grocery Co. v. Leman
Supreme Court of Florida
This case was decided by Division A. Writ of error to the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShackleford, J.
— For the second time we are called on by writ of error to review the judgment rendered in this case. See Hillsborough Grocery Co. v. Leman & Wright, 51 Fla. 203, 40 South. Rep. 680. As was set forth there, an action of assumpsit upon the common counts was brought by the defendants in error against the plaintiff in error. The defendant in the court below filed three pleas, (1) that it never was indebted as alleged; (2) that it did not promise as alleged and a third plea, which was as follows:
“That the plaintiffs at the commencement of this suit were and still are indebted to the defendant…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Southern Home Insurance v. PutnalSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
- McKinnon v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
- Benedict Pineapple Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. HollisSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. RentzSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- West Virginia Hotel Corp. v. W. C. Foster Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931
- American Fire Insurance v. King Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1917
- Ross v. SavageSupreme Court of Florida · 1913
- Geo. E. Wood Lumber Co. v. Gipson ex rel. GilmoreSupreme Court of Florida · 1912
- Huffstetler v. Our Home Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.