Legal Opinion

Selig v. Novak

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 25, 1974No. 73-253PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lyle Brown, Justice.

Appellee Stephen R. Novak held a license issued by the Arkansas Securities Commissioner to act as agent for Raney Brothers, Inc., a broker-dealer registered with the Commissioner. Raney’s authority was restricted to transactions in municipal and other governmental securities. The Commissioner, after a public hearing on five charges instituted by appellant and against appellee, permanently revoked appellee’s license. On appeal to circuit court it was held that the findings upon which the Commissioner based the permanent suspension were affected by error of law and not…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Charles Hughes & Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  3. Otis & Co. v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
  4. Pierce v. Richard Ellis & Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1970
  5. Handley Investment Company v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hardcastle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1988
  2. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API