Legal Opinion

State v. Robran

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided February 6, 1991No. 18274PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Chief Judge.

Steven Mark Robran appeals his conviction for rape. On review, we are asked to determine whether the Information was sufficient to charge the crime of rape. We are also asked to examine the record to determine whether there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction. As explained below, we affirm.

The relevant facts are as follows. In the late evening of December 27, 1988, Robran entered the unlocked apartment of the complaining witness, a twenty-three year old female. She had fallen asleep in her bed with the lights on while waiting for her boyfriend to arrive.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. Hugh MacLeod Pheaster, United States of America v. Angelo IncisoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  3. State v. LankfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. WindsorIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. FenleyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. LampienIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. AndersonIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. LundquistIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. HolcombIdaho Court of Appeals · 1995

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API