Legal Opinion

State v. Misik

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 23, 1989PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

238 N.J. Super. 367 (1989)

569 A.2d 894

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF,

v.

JANOS MISIK, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Bergen County.

Decided June 23, 1989.

Alan L. Zegas for defendant.

Raymond F. Flood (appearing for the firm of Weissbard & Wiewiorka, attorneys) on behalf of the Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers of New Jersey as amicus curiae.

Nanette Clinch, Special Deputy Attorney General (Acting Assistant Prosecutor) on behalf of the State of New Jersey.

QUASI-CRIMINAL ACTION OPINION

EICHEN, J.S.C.

The primary and novel issue in this case is whether the Due Process Clause…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Hernandez-LopezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  2. In Re Francisco M.California Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Perkins v. ClickDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API