In Re Francisco M.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WILLHITE, J. *
The law has long recognized that “[t]he duty to disclose knowledge of crime rests upon all citizens. It is so vital that one known to be innocent may be detained, in the absence of bail, as a material witness.” (Stein v. New York (1953) 346 U.S. 156, 184 [73 S.Ct. 1077, 1092, 97 L.Ed. 1522], fn. omitted; see Barry v. United States ex rel. Cunningham (1929) 279 U.S. 597, 616-618 [49 S.Ct. 452, 456-457, 73 L.Ed. 867].) In California, as applicable to witnesses deemed material for trial, this principle is embodied in Penal Code section 1332. Under that section, on an…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Stein v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Blair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. WoodheadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. CudjoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. Hernandez-LopezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
- People v. BunyardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- In the Matter of Justin Alexander Marshall Justin Alexander Marshall v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
- People v. RoldanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- In re D. W.California Court of Appeal · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.